Recently in Reports Category
The number of jobs in America's emerging clean energy economy grew nearly two and a half times faster than overall jobs between 1998 and 2007, according to a report released by The Pew Charitable Trusts. Pew developed a clear, data-driven definition of the clean energy economy and conducted the first-ever hard count across all 50 states of the actual jobs, companies and venture capital investments that supply the growing market demand for environmentally friendly products and services.
Pew found that jobs in the clean energy economy grew at a national rate of 9.1 percent, while traditional jobs grew by only 3.7 percent between 1998 and 2007. There was a similar pattern at the state level, where job growth in the clean energy economy outperformed overall job growth in 38 states and the District of Columbia during the same period. The report also found that this promising sector is poised to expand significantly, driven by increasing consumer demand, venture capital infusions, and federal and state policy reforms.
The report states that Southeast states would generally rely on biomass co-firing and the purchase of renewable energy credits to reach the mandate. John Wilson of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy disputes this finding. "The technical report's regional perspective is at odds with similar studies by others, and with our own investigation into the potential for renewable energy in the Southeast," Wilson wrote on his blog. "The three major problems with this report are: biopower is poorly analyzed, or at least poorly documented; transmission is assumed to be built quickly; and distributed generation is not adequately considered." To read more of Wilson's comments visit the SACE energy blog.
Southeast states seeking solutions to current and future energy challenges have a major opportunity to use existing technology to harness local renewable energy resources. Our regional assessment, drawing on recent government and regional studies, suggests sufficient renewable energy resources to meet as much as 30 percent of the Southeast's electric power needs within the next 15 years.The full report can be found here.
- Between April 2007 and April 2008, an increase in ethanol production accounted for 10 to 15 percent of the 5.1 percent increase rise in food prices during the same time period. Therefore, ethanol was responsible for .5 to .8 percentage points of this 5.1 percent increase.
- During the same period, higher prices for energy directly increased the price of food by 22 percent, or 1.1 percentage points of the 5.1 percent increase.
- The production, distribution, and consumption of corn ethanol creates 20 percent less greenhouse gas emissions than the equivalent process for gasoline. The CBO analysis considered the amount of carbon dioxide removed from the atmosphere when the corn is grown.
- While the report states that most plants use natural gas, when coal is used instead, the greenhouse gas emissions exceed those of gasoline.
- Ethanol made from plants, trees, or waste, known as biomass, could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 85 to 95 percent relative to gasoline.
The Sierra Club and Worldwatch Institute today released a report, Smart Choices for Biofuels, highlighting the need for important policy reforms at this critical juncture in America's effort to increase the use of biofuels. The report outlines the economic and environmental impacts of first-generation biofuels such as corn ethanol, proposes strategies to make the biofuels industry more sustainable, and offers specific policy recommendations in four broad categories:
- Developing sustainability standards
- Advancing biofuels production and new technologies
- Creating green jobs through biofuels
- Promoting policy coherence across energy sectors
Increasing the amount of ethanol blended into gasoline from 10 percent to 20 percent causes no significant change in performance of automotive fuel systems according to research conducted by the Minnesota Center for Automotive Research at Minnesota State University, Mankato. The study examined the impact of gasoline with a 20 percent blend of ethanol (E20) on the endurance, wear and performance of automotive fuel pumps and sending units. This study is the fourth in a series of research projects conducted to determine the effect of E20 on fuel system components.The study looked at eight models of fuel pumps, running three identical versions of each model for 4,000 hours using one of three different fuels - gasoline, E10 and E20. Gasoline and E10 were used in the study as a reference to identify what effects two accepted fuels would have on the pumps and sending units. The 24 pumps were selected to represent a variety of manufacturers, model years, common vehicles and designs. In addition, the study examined the effect of E20 on nine different makes and models of sending units.
The study found that the pumps showed significantly less wear when tested with E20 than with gasoline. The study concluded that overall, E20 did not have any greater negative effects than gasoline or E10 on the fuel pumps tested. It also showed there were no substantial differences in the performance of the sending units tested in the three different fuels.